Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBoug, Pål
dc.contributor.authorCappelen, Ådne
dc.contributor.authorSwensen, Anders Rygh
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-05T21:04:03Z
dc.date.available2011-11-05T21:04:03Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1892-753x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/180855
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Recently, several authors have questioned the evidence claimed by Galí and Gertler (1999) and Galí, Gertler and López-Salido (2001) that a hybrid version of the New Keynesian Phillips Curve approximates European and US inflation dynamics quite well. We re-examine the evidence using likelihood-based methods. Although including lagged inflation enhances the empirical fit, the improvement is not large enough to yield a model that passes a likelihood ratio test. We also show that the likelihood surface is rather flat, especially in the European case, indicating that the model may be weakly identified as criticised by others using alternative methods. Keywords: European and US inflation, the New Keynesian Phillips Curve, vector autoregressive models and likelihood ratio tests.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherStatistics Norway, Research Departmentno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Papers;No. 500
dc.subjectNew Keynesian Phillips Curveno_NO
dc.subjectVector autoregressive modelsno_NO
dc.subjectInflationno_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: C51no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: C52no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: E31no_NO
dc.titleThe New Keynesian Phillips Curve revisitedno_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber22 s.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel