Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHægeland, Torbjørn
dc.contributor.authorMøen, Jarle
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-18T18:15:41Z
dc.date.available2012-02-18T18:15:41Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1892-7513
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/181263
dc.description.abstractWe first study how participation in the Norwegian R&D tax credit scheme affects the probability of receiving other R&D and innovation subsidies. We find no evidence suggesting that using the R&D tax credit increase the probability of receiving direct R&D subsidies in the future, but we cannot exclude the possibility of an immediate positive effect. At the individual firm level, direct subsidies and the tax credit seem to be complements, while at the innovation system level they seem to be substitutes, as the probability of receiving direct subsidies has fallen after the introduction of the tax credit scheme. Next, we compare the additionality of the R&D tax credit with direct R&D subsidies. Our preferred estimate suggests that each public krone spent on tax credits for firms investing below the 4 million cap on intramural R&D increases private intramural R&D by 2.68 kroner. This estimate builds on an assumption of zero additionality for firms above the 4 million cap. We find that the additionality of subsidies awarded through the Research Council and Innovation Norway is 2.07 and 1.53 respectively. The additionality of grants awarded by ministries and other public agencies is 0.64, and the additionality of R&D subsidies from the EU is 0.75. We stress the potential for both positive and negative biases in these estimates. Direct R&D subsidies are intended for projects with low private return and high social return. We find that projects funded through direct grants have essentially zero returns. Although surprisingly low, this is consistent with a high quality grant allocation process. Our estimate for the return to R&D projects financed by tax credits is just slightly below the return to R&D projects financed by own funds. This is to be expected as this type of R&D has a lower marginal price. The estimated returns are 16 % and 19 % respectively. All estimates are likely to be downward biased by measurement errors in the R&D variables. Furthermore, there is large variance in the returns to R&DOrdninger og tiltak innføres sjelden eller aldri i et vakuum. De kommer gjerne i tillegg til eller i stedet for eksisterende ordninger, og implementeres i en virkelighet hvor andre lover, regelverk og andre generelle virkemidler også påvirker aktørenes tilpasning til og eventuelle effekter av den nye ordningen. Innføringen av SkatteFUNN-ordningen er ikke noe unntak fra dette. I denne rapportent studerer vi hvordan SkatteFUNNordningen virker i samspill med andre virkemidler for FoU, med spesiell vekt på hvorvidt innføringen av SkatteFUNN har påvirket sannsynligheten for å få tilgang til eller benytte seg av andre deler av virkemiddelapparatet. I tillegg har vi sett på forskjeller i innsatsaddisjonalitet og avkastning mellom ulike typer virkemidler. projects. When estimating the return parameters year by year, they vary considerably around their overall mean. __no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherStatistics Norwayno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReports;2007/45
dc.subjectInnovation policyno_NO
dc.subjectR&D taxno_NO
dc.subjectR&D investmentsno_NO
dc.subjectInnvesteringerno_NO
dc.subjectCorporate taxno_NO
dc.subjectSkatterno_NO
dc.subjectNæringsvirksomhetno_NO
dc.subjectFoU-subsidierno_NO
dc.subjectSkatteinsentiverno_NO
dc.subjectSkattekredittno_NO
dc.titleThe relationship between the Norwegian R&D tax credit scheme and other innovation policy instrumentsno_NO
dc.typeResearch reportno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber31 s.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel