Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBjertnæs, Geir H. M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-21T11:29:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-21T11:29:55Z
dc.date.issued2020-04
dc.identifier.issn1892-753X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2651884
dc.description.abstractSeveral studies show cases where the Samuelson rule holds, or where the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) equals one within optimized tax systems. The conditions for the original Samuelson rule to hold in these studies are quite restrictive, and MCF measures employed are not consistent with MCF measures employed within real-world cost-benefit tests. The aim of the present study is to remove such restrictive conditions, and to construct a MCF measure designed for real-world costbenefit tests. The study shows that such a MCF exceeds one within optimized tax systems. Hence, the optimal supply of public goods is below the supply obtained by the Samuelson rule. The study further shows that income taxation below optimum requires an even higher MCF to prevent that public goods provision crowd out social security transfers with a higher marginal welfare gain.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherStatistisk sentralbyråen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper;No. 925
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectMarginal cost of public fundsen_US
dc.subjectThe Samuelson ruleen_US
dc.subjectOptimal taxationen_US
dc.subjectSocial security transfersen_US
dc.titleThe marginal (opportunity) cost of public fundsen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212en_US
dc.source.pagenumber31en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal