Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAune, Finn Roar
dc.contributor.authorGolombek, Rolf
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T15:58:45Z
dc.date.available2022-03-21T15:58:45Z
dc.date.created2021-06-09T16:42:28Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Journal. 2021, 42 (3), 225-264.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-6574
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986625
dc.description.abstractIn 2018, an agreement between the key EU institutions—the Commission, the European Parliament, and the European Council—was reached after a long-lasting discourse over the 2030 EU climate and energy policy package. This paper offers a comprehensive assessment of the EU package, with its three main targets: lower greenhouse gas emissions, higher renewable share in final energy consumption, and improved energy efficiency. We find that the renewable and energy efficiency targets have been set so high that the derived emissions reduction (50 percent) exceeds the EU climate target (40 percent). Hence, there is no need for an EU climate policy, for example, to use carbon prices to reach the EU climate goals. It is, however, not cost-efficient to achieve the climate target by imposing the three EU targets. We demonstrate that a cost-efficient policy that obtains a 50 percent GHG emissions reduction would increase annual welfare (relative to the Reference scenario) by an amount corresponding to 0.6 percent of GDP in Europe.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Association for Energy Economicsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAre Carbon Prices Redundant in the 2030 EU Climate and Energy Policy Package?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210en_US
dc.source.pagenumber225-264en_US
dc.source.volume42en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Journalen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5547/01956574.42.3.faun
dc.identifier.cristin1914898
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 209698en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 243626en_US
dc.relation.projectEU/308481en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal