Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDagsvik, John K.
dc.contributor.authorWennemo, Tom
dc.contributor.authorWetterwald, Dag
dc.contributor.authorAaberge, Rolf
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-07T17:27:19Z
dc.date.available2012-02-07T17:27:19Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationTransportation Research Part B: Methodological, Volume 36, Number 4, May 2002 , pp. 361-384no_NO
dc.identifier.issn0191-2615
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/178084
dc.descriptionThis is the accepted version of a work that was accepted for publication in Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Volume 36, Number 4, May 2002 , pp. 361-384.no_NO
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles. The alternative fuel vehicles we consider are liquid propane gas and electric powered vehicles in addition to dual-fuel vehicles. The data were obtained from a stated preference survey in which each respondent, in a randomly selected sample, was exposed to 15 experiments. In each experiment the respondents were asked to rank three hypothetical vehicles characterized by specific attributes, according to the respondents' preferences. Several versions of a random utility model are formulated and estimated. They include a model for rank ordered data, and models that allow for different types of correlation in preferences across experiments. Apart from one case the model specifications are estimated from the data on first choices. The most general model turns out to predict aggregate second and third choices rather well. The model is applied to assess the willingness to pay for alternative fuel vehicles. --Keywords: Random utility; Alternative fuel vehicles; Models for ranking; Serially dependent preferences , Stated preference.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherElsevierno_NO
dc.subjectFuelno_NO
dc.subjectDrivstofferno_NO
dc.subjectMotorkjøretøyerno_NO
dc.subjectVehiclesno_NO
dc.subjectEtterspørselno_NO
dc.subjectNorwayno_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: C51no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: C93no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: D12no_NO
dc.subjectScientific articleno_NO
dc.titlePotential demand for alternative fuel vehiclesno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber361-384no_NO
dc.source.volume36no_NO
dc.source.journalTransportation Research Part B: Methodologicalno_NO
dc.source.issueNumber 4no_NO
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00013-1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel