Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAslaksen, Iulie
dc.contributor.authorSynnestvedt, Terje
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-23T13:08:46Z
dc.date.available2011-11-23T13:08:46Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.issn1892-753x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/180425
dc.description.abstractAbstract: The relationship between the concept of option value in the literature on environmental preservation and the financial theory of option value is discussed by Fisher (2000), suggesting an equivalence between the two concepts. In a recent paper, Mensink and Requate (2004) argue that Fisher’s claim is incorrect. In this paper we clarify Fisher’s argument by drawing on the article by Hanemann (1989), whereby we find the conditions for the Arrow-Fisher-Henry-Hanemann (AFHH) and the Dixit-Pindyck (DP) option value concepts to coincide or not. The main point is that the AFHH option value is derived under the assumption that investment does not take place in the first period, neither in the closed-loop nor in the open-loop strategy, whereas the analysis of the DP option value is based on the assumption that investment in the open-loop strategy takes place in the first period. Keywords: Option value, Uncertainty, Information, Irreversibility, Environmentno_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherStatistics Norway, Research Departmentno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Papers;No. 390
dc.subjectEnvironmentno_NO
dc.subjectOption valueno_NO
dc.subjectEnvironmental preservationno_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: D81no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: Q20no_NO
dc.titleAre the Dixit-Pindyck and the Arrow-Fisher-Henry-Hanemann option values equivalent?no_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber17 s.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel