Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKornstad, Tom
dc.contributor.authorThoresen, Thor Olav
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-02T18:29:33Z
dc.date.available2012-02-02T18:29:33Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.issn1892-753x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/180817
dc.description.abstractImproving the distributional impact of transfers may be costly if it reduces labour supply. In this paper we show how effects of changes in the design of the child benefit programme can be examined by deriving information from behavioural and non-behavioural simulations on micro data. The direct distributional effects are assessed by taxbenefit model calculations. Female labour supply responses to alternative child benefit schemes are simulated under the assumption that choices are discrete. The discrete choice model is justified with reference to the complicated process of finding a new job, and the existence of peaks in the empirical distribution of hours is interpreted as variation in number of jobs across states. The distribution of income after labour supply responses is also shown. The analysis confirms that enhanced distributional impact is traded against reductions in labour supply.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherStatistics Norway, Research Departmentno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Papers;No. 262
dc.subjectLabour supplyno_NO
dc.subjectChild benefitno_NO
dc.subjectMicro simulationno_NO
dc.subjectDiscrete choiceno_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: C35no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: D12no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: H23no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: H31no_NO
dc.subjectJEL classification: J22no_NO
dc.titleMeans-testing the child benefitno_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber24 s.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel