Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStorrøsten, Halvor Briseid
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-11T13:16:12Z
dc.date.available2018-01-11T13:16:12Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-20
dc.identifier.issn1892-753X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2477023
dc.description.abstractAnnouncement of future environmental regulation is likely to reduce current emissions in the combined presence of resource scarcity and adjustment costs. This contrasts with the results in the literature on the green paradox. Further, efficient transition towards a low emission economy requires an investment tax on emission intensive production, unless firms have perfect information about the future. Moreover, investments in clean substitutes should first receive a subsidy, but may thereafter be taxed. The optimal tax on production differs from the Pigouvian tax in the case of scarce resources. Last, a uniform tax across heterogeneous agents can induce the socially optimal outcome only if firms have equal expectations about the future.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherStatistics Norway, Research departmentnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Papers;No. 864
dc.subjectKlimaendringnb_NO
dc.subjectInvesteringernb_NO
dc.subjectSkatter og avgifternb_NO
dc.titleRegulation in the presence of adjustment costs and resource scarcity: transition dynamics and intertemporal effectsnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber45 s.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel