Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Vidar
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T13:54:14Z
dc.date.available2020-05-05T13:54:14Z
dc.date.issued1990-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2653382
dc.description.abstractThis note discusses the welfare implications of the phenomenon that the long-term response to a tax reform is often much stronger than the impact in the short run. As a polar case a beneficial revenueneutral reform is considered whereby the tax is increased on the consumption of a commodity that is fixed in the short run, but flexible in the long run. The message of this note is that the welfare gain may be greater in the short run. The reason is that the larger long-term response can be socially undesirable because it represents a distortionary effect.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherStatistisk sentralbyråen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper;No. 47
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA note on the short run versus long run welfare gain from a tax reformen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.source.pagenumber10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal